HWBOT Team Cup 2018 - SC4: DDR4 - 3DMark11 - Extreme

Stage: 3DMark11 - Extreme Dual GPU open - closed since 31 Oct

Back to competition

Stage Details

3DMark11 - Extreme is closed since 31 October 2018.

LIMITATIONS

Use 2 videocard(s).
No server CPUS allowed
must use 2 single core GPUs
A Futuremark verification link is required
A verification screenshot is required.
Please attach a picture of your overclocking rig.
Only submissions made on or after 2018-08-05 are allowed.
Only use retail hardware.
Only use DDR4 SDRAM memory.
Use official background: download

Currently top leader

/r/overclocking 24799 marks good for 50 pts

Participate

Stage 1 - Geekbench3 - Multi Core - Dual Cores only
Stage 2 - Y-Cruncher - Pi-1b - Quad cores only
Stage 3 - Cinebench R15 - Divided per core
Stage 4 - PCMark 7
Stage 5 - 3DMark Vantage - Performance: GPU score - no Titans
Stage 6 - 3DMark11 - Extreme Dual GPU
Stage 7 - 3DMark - Fire Strike Integrated CPU graphics
Stage 8 - Aquamark AMD CPUs & GPUs only

Latest submissions for stage 3DMark11 - Extreme

Rankings or points out of date? Recalculate ranking

	Benchmark	Score	User		Team		Frequency		Hardware	Cooling
1.	3DMark11 - Extreme	11177 marks		MaddMutt		Overclockers.com	1300/1853 MHz	2x	GeForce GTX 970	H2O	0 0
2.	3DMark11 - Extreme	14173 marks		The Silver		French Legion	1740/2002 MHz	2x	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	Stock	0 0
3.	3DMark11 - Extreme	27241 marks		Oldscarface		Madshrimps Belgium OC Team	n/a	2x	ASUS ROG Strix OC Edition GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Stock	0 0
4.	3DMark11 - Extreme	23853 marks		bee144		/r/overclocking	2050/5454 MHz	2x	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	H2O	0 3
5.	3DMark11 - Extreme	23274 marks		bee144		/r/overclocking	2050/5454 MHz	2x	Titan X Pascal	H2O	0 0
6.	3DMark11 - Extreme	11900 marks		avalanche		Warp9-systems	1150/1800 MHz	2x	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	Stock	0 2
7.	3DMark11 - Extreme	27293 marks		Wizerty		French Legion	n/a	2x	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	H2O	0 1
8.	3DMark11 - Extreme	11095 marks		TyphooNick		Overclockers.UA	1413/2029 MHz	2x	ASUS Strix DC2OC GeForce GTX 970	Air	0 0
9.	3DMark11 - Extreme	9928 marks		varachio		Hellas Overclocking Team	1170/1750 MHz	2x	Radeon HD 7970	Stock	0 2
10.	3DMark11 - Extreme	24066 marks		SergeyR		Overclockers.UA	1748/1483 MHz	2x	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Air	0 0

Time left:

Closed!

Select stage ranking:

Overall
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

3DMark11 - Extreme Dual GPU

Scoring method: top 3 average using unique videocards

24799 marks

/r/overclocking

50 pts

24499.67 marks

Overclock.net

48 pts

20089 marks

French Legion

46 pts

18978.67 marks

Team Mlg

44 pts

17061.33 marks

Warp9-systems

42 pts

15623.33 marks

Overclockers.ua

40 pts

15618.67 marks

Overclockers.com

38 pts

12768.33 marks

Xtremeoverdrive Oc Team Italy

36 pts

(2/3)

10689.67 marks

Team Hardware-reaktor-reloaded

34 pts

(2/3)

4719 marks

Hellas Overclocking Team

32 pts

(2/3)

9080.33 marks

Madshrimps Belgium Oc Team

30 pts

(1/3)

6515.33 marks

Cowcotland

28 pts

(1/3)

6187.33 marks

Team Brazil

26 pts

(1/3)

3558.33 marks

Team Hungary

24 pts

(1/3)

1207 marks

Hardware.fr [hfr]

22 pts

(1/3)

Go to stage

If you want to integrate the competition ranking on your site, you can use our xml feed: link.

Official competition

This is an online event. Participants can compete from all around the world, and make submissions online.

As this is an official level 2 OC-ESPORTS competition, competitors will receive points for the final ranking as following:

First place: 20 Points
Second place: 16 Points
Third place: 12 Points
Fourth place: 8 Points
Fifth place: 4 Points

View awarded points

Comments

Discuss the competition at the HWBOT forum (29 comments)

jpmboy says:

8 months ago –

is not the Radeon RX Vega M GH a discrete GPU?

mickulty says:

8 months ago –

11 hours ago, jpmboy said:

is not the Radeon RX Vega M GH a discrete GPU?

I made this argument to leeg before the competition started - it is on the same package as the CPU, but is connected with PCIe 3.0 x8 (over EMIB rather than the motherboard but still) and exclusively uses its own HBM rather than system memory. The only IGP-like thing about it is the shared power management.

Apparently it's allowed, and we get a lot of people with different hardware on /r/overclocking so we easily found a user willing to bench it competitively. As a result, however hard you OC no-one without Vega M will be able to touch our score for that stage. I think Skull Canyon NUCs start at $700 for the OC locked Vega M GL version (DDR4 SODIMMs sold separately), have fun.

Alternatively since afaik no-one has gone out and bought one for the comp I'd still totally support them being retroactively banned. We have to take advantage, if we don't someone else will, but it's not how I wanna win stages.

MaddMutt says:

8 months ago –

I know this may sound dumb but someone will always try to read between the lines. The Y-Cruncher bench has the CPU listed as "Use 4 Cores in Total". This would imply that you can use an 8 Core CPU BUT disable 4 of the Cores.

Mr.Scott says:

8 months ago –

9 hours ago, MaddMutt said:

someone will always try to read between the lines. The Y-Cruncher bench has the CPU listed as "Use 4 Cores in Total". This would imply that you can use an 8 Core CPU BUT disable 4 of the Cores.

Don't read between the lines then.

I don't see that implication at all.

jpmboy says:

8 months ago –

[Quote] I made this argument to leeg before the competition started - it is on the same package as the CPU, but is connected with PCIe 3.0 x8 (over EMIB rather than the motherboard but still) and exclusively uses its own HBM rather than system memory. The only IGP-like thing about it is the shared power management. Apparently it's allowed, and we get a lot of people with different hardware on /r/overclocking so we easily found a user willing to bench it competitively. As a result, however hard you OC no-one without Vega M will be able to touch our score for that stage. I think Skull Canyon NUCs start at $700 for the OC locked Vega M GL version (DDR4 SODIMMs sold separately), have fun. Alternatively since afaik no-one has gone out and bought one for the comp I'd still totally support them being retroactively banned. We have to take advantage, if we don't someone else will, but it's not how I wanna win stage[Quote] only asking as I did not know if they are acceptable or not. Good going, I hope OCN can find a couple of users with the RX vega M. :thumb:.

leeghoofd says:

8 months ago –

It is listed at HWBOT as integrated GPU... so hence why it is allowed for this stage... but again Team Cup is not won in one stage

For the below, disabling cores has never been allowed, in contradiction to unlocking cores

21 hours ago, MaddMutt said:

I know this may sound dumb but someone will always try to read between the lines. The Y-Cruncher bench has the CPU listed as "Use 4 Cores in Total". This would imply that you can use an 8 Core CPU BUT disable 4 of the Cores.

MaddMutt says:

8 months ago –

Windows 10 Not allowed?? I thought that had been fixed.

leeghoofd says:

8 months ago –

depends on the benchmark and CPU used

CjMitsuki says:

7 months ago –

What is going on with the links to the 3dmark Vantage submissions that have already been made by teams? I try to view submissions by clicking the overall score and it only says "There are no submissions." So far it seems to be the case for any team that has all 3 submissions. The permalink brings up a Bitly "page not found" message. Is it only me or is this the case for others trying to view it as well?

leeghoofd says:

7 months ago –

thx for the report, @richba5tard

Matt26LFC says:

7 months ago –

Not sure why but TeamMLGs 3rd R15 run has not been taken into account, still says we need one more score even though the sub is listed at the bottom of the page!?

leeghoofd says:

7 months ago –

Richbastard is investigating the CB bug, vantage is solved

varachio says:

7 months ago –

SC4: DDR4 - PCMark 7: Can I use 6950X cpu? Or 5820K? Sorry if I am asking again but so far I do not seen that kind of question or answer.

unityofsaints says:

7 months ago –

17 hours ago, varachio said:

SC4: DDR4 - PCMark 7: Can I use 6950X cpu? Or 5820K? Sorry if I am asking again but so far I do not seen that kind of question or answer.

Any consumer DDR4 platform should be fine

varachio says:

7 months ago –

5 hours ago, unityofsaints said:

Any consumer DDR4 platform should be fine

Thanks!

yosarianilives says:

7 months ago –

Any update on cinebench per core rankings?

yosarianilives says:

6 months ago –

@Leeghoofd @richba5tard Any progress on this? I know for example that my 6.36 ghz 7350k r15 results of 711 (355.5 per core) is not being applied to our score while a 5.2 ghz 6700k r15 result of 1176 (294 per core) is. Hopefully this ranking is sorted by end of comp.

Matsglobetrotter says:

6 months ago –

i have the same issue for team MLG on my 7350 score

leeghoofd says:

6 months ago –

I got the heads up by Frederik that some of your teammates also benched similar CPUs, overruling your sub,

Plz email Frederik for an exact detailed description who submitted what at frederik@hwbot.org

Matsglobetrotter says:

6 months ago –

thats not the issue Leeg. we are two members who have submitted 7740 x results. meanwhile i have also submitted a 7350 score that per core is higher than all. but as the overall summary score is higher the per core score is not considered.

Matsglobetrotter says:

6 months ago –

I have sent message to fredrik

Hi,

for Team MLG this is the situation on the cb 15 team cup socres on ddr4. I first submitted the I3 7350 K score which has 311.5 points per core.

http://hwbot.org/submission/3936715_matsglobetrotter_cinebench___r15_core_i3_7350k_623_cb

the 7350 is a 2 core thus 623/2 = 311.5 points per core

When dragon soop submitted his i7 7740x score of 1168 my 7350 score was kicked off the table despite that my score is higher per core..

http://hwbot.org/submission/3946409_dragon_soop_cinebench___r15_core_i7_7740x_1168_cb

the 7740x is a 4 core thus 1168/4 = 292 points per core

currently within the team we thus overall get a 6.5 point or so lower average score than we should have and it is the difference to gain one slot in the Cb15 scoring.

Thanks otherwise for a great competition. I really enjoy the team competition.

Regards,

Matsglobetrotter

Frito11 says:

6 months ago –

we just tested this in r/overclocking, @unityofsaintshad a low 7350k sub and @yosarianilives has our high one that is not counting, unity deleted his sub and so far no change, i believe perhaps it is specific to 7350k subs and the algorithm is not dividing the 7350k by 2 as it should as its a dual core CPU and thus its getting tossed out by anything that is a quad core or above?

Frito11 says:

6 months ago –

The other possibility i notice is that this stage is taking into account for some reason the cpu architecture codenames perhaps as there is no sub with multiple scores in the top 3 with the same arch, exception being kabylake-s(7700k etc) and kabylake-x (7740x) this would also explain why both our team (r/overclocking) and MLG are encountering the issue as both of us have 7700k subs that beat out the 7350k sub

bolc says:

6 months ago –

16 hours ago, Matsglobetrotter said:

thats not the issue Leeg. we are two members who have submitted 7740 x results. meanwhile i have also submitted a 7350 score that per core is higher than all. but as the overall summary score is higher the per core score is not considered.

if u haven t tried: delete your 2 scores and resub the highest 7350, by retyping all the info. Do not use a previous sub info, which can m,ess up things around

Matsglobetrotter says:

6 months ago –

23 minutes ago, bolc said:

if u haven t tried: delete your 2 scores and resub the highest 7350, by retyping all the info. Do not use a previous sub info, which can m,ess up things around

I have deleted my scores. I cant delete another members scores and even if i resub my 7350 now it will not be shown, no score recount happens as the issue persist on the competition machine

Matsglobetrotter says:

6 months ago –

now i have submitted a score of 623 on a dual core which is above jumpers 539 on a dual core and still my result is not taken.. ok atleast i have seen some change on the cb15 counting as otherwise jumpers would not have shown up. my sub is as per rules so one more issue?

Matsglobetrotter says:

6 months ago –

you guys tell me whats wrong here http://hwbot.org/submission/3968870_matsglobetrotter_cinebench___r15_core_i3_7350k_623_cb

Frito11 says:

6 months ago –

I think its like i said a few days ago, most likely for some reason they have the stage set to only allow one sub per architecture code-name even though it does not state so in the rules. this is the only thing that i can think of that seems to fit what i see in every teams scores, everyones top 3 is some combination of 1x coffee lake, kabylake-S, kabylake-X and skylake, none ever have two kabylake-s subs counting even if they have a 2nd lower kabylake-s sub that will beat out a sub from one of the other architectures.

leeghoofd says:

6 months ago –

Changed the configuration, similar to the geekbench one... seems way better now

Please log in or register to comment.